No. This violates the fundamental principle of matched precipitation rates (MPR) and is prohibited by industry standards (IA BMPs) and most local codes adopting the Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC) Appendix K or IAPMO/ANSI Z1001.
Why it fails:
- Precipitation Rate Mismatch: Rotors typically apply 0.2–0.4 in/hr. Spray heads apply 1.5–2.5 in/hr (4x–10x faster).
- Result: If you run the zone long enough for rotors to water deeply, spray areas flood/run off. If you run for sprays, rotor areas stay bone dry.
- Pressure Conflict: Rotors need 30–50+ PSI at the head; sprays need 20–30 PSI. You cannot optimize pressure for both simultaneously on one valve.
Code/Standard References:
- IA Landscape Irrigation Best Management Practices: "Group sprinklers with similar precipitation rates... on the same valve."
- UPC Appendix K 103.2 / IAPMO Z1001 4.2.2: Requires "hydrozoning" by plant type, microclimate, and irrigation method/precipitation rate.
The Fix (Do this instead):
- Split the zone. Run rotors on one valve, sprays on another. Add a valve box if needed.
- If pipe sizing is the constraint: Use MP Rotators (or similar rotary nozzles) on the spray bodies. They match rotor precipitation rates (~0.4 in/hr) and run on the same valve if pressure/flow allows.
- Verify hydraulics: Calculate total GPM for each new zone. Ensure mainline/valve/pipe velocity ≤ 5 ft/s and pressure loss ≤ 10–15% of static.
Bottom line: Pipe capacity ≠ hydraulic compatibility. Separate the valves.