BlueCollarBench

Trades/Carpentry & Framing

Carpentry & FramingTask CA-035journeymanCatchUS

Framer put a double 2x10 header over a 6-foot patio door in a bearing wall, but instead of jack studs he end-nailed the header through the king studs with four 16d each side and ran cripples up to the top plate.

Prompt as given to every model

Framer put a double 2x10 header over a 6-foot patio door in a bearing wall, but instead of jack studs he end-nailed the header through the king studs with four 16d each side and ran cripples up to the top plate. He says the nails and the cripples carry it. Does that pass?

Model answers

Pick up to two to compare side by side. Score chips fill in as the judge grades.

Laguna S 2.1Score —

No, this does not pass code.

IRC Requirements:

  • R502.5 requires headers to be supported by jack studs (trimmers) that extend from the header to the sole plate.
  • R502.6 requires cripple studs to be full-height from top plate to header, not just nailed to king studs.

Why it fails:

  1. No jack studs = header load is transferred only through end-nails (16d) into the king studs. This is not an approved load path.
  2. End-nailing doesn't provide adequate shear transfer for a 6-foot span with a double 2x10 header (which likely carries significant roof/load above).
  3. Cripples must bear on the header — they can’t just be nailed to king studs.

Fix:

  • Install jack studs (2x material) from header down to sole plate.
  • Secure header to jack studs with header hangers or toe-nailing per R502.5(1).
  • Install cripple studs from top plate down to header, spaced per R502.6 (typically 16" o.c. max).

Bottom line: This is a structural deficiency. The header needs proper jack stud support. A framer doing it this way is cutting corners and violating code. Get it fixed before drywall.

450 tokens · 11.0s

Judge rubric · pending

Not graded yet. Grading starts when the exam run completes.

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550BScore —

No, this does not pass code. It is a structural deficiency requiring correction.

Code Basis (IRC 2021/2024):

  • R602.7.5 (Supports for headers): Headers in bearing walls shall be supported by jack studs, framing anchors, or approved hangers. End-nailing through king studs is not a listed prescriptive method.
  • Table R602.7(1) & (2): Header spans for a 6-ft opening in a bearing wall (supporting roof + ceiling + one floor) require a double 2×10 with two jack studs each end (or engineered design).
  • R602.7.1 (Nailing): The 4-16d end-nails you describe satisfy king-to-jack nailing (Table R602.3(1), Item 2), not header-to-king bearing.

Why it fails:

  1. Bearing vs. Shear: End-nails loaded in withdrawal/shear cannot reliably transfer the concentrated header reaction (often 3,000–5,000+ lbs) into the king stud. Jack studs provide direct bearing (compression perpendicular to grain), which is the code-prescriptive load path.
  2. Cripples are irrelevant: Cripples transfer top-plate loads down to the header; they do not support the header ends.
  3. Shrinkage/Deflection: As lumber dries, end-nail gaps open, transferring zero load.

Required Fix: Install two jack studs (trimmers) at each end of the header, bearing fully on the sole plate, face-nailed to king studs (10d/16d @ 16" o.c. per Table R602.3(1)) and to the header. If space is tight, use simpson LUS/LSU hangers rated for the calculated reaction (requires engineering stamp for non-prescriptive hanger use on a double 2×10).

Bottom line: Tell the framer to cut and install the jack studs. It’s the only code-compliant fix without an engineer’s letter.

622 tokens · 61.0s

Judge rubric · pending

Not graded yet. Grading starts when the exam run completes.